Theology Matters

Faith Virtue Knowledge


8 Comments

Faith, Faithfulness and Reward

Faith and Faithfulness:

Hebrews 11:6 tells us that ‘without faith it is impossible to please God because the one who comes to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of those who earnestly seek him.” Interestingly, the word which is translated faith here (pistis), can equally be translated faithfulness. And though the two words faith and faithfulness are obviously related in English (as in Greek), we often tend to think of the notion of ‘faith’ as mere intellectual assent to a set of propositions, which is divorced from ‘action’ consistent with that belief (faithfulness).

The Bible speaks of God himself as being faithful (pistos). When we say that God is faithful, we mean that we can trust God because God always acts according to his word. He is not capricious. But when the bible speaks of humans being faithful, it does so (apparently to us at least) in two distinct ways. It speaks of ‘the faithful’ to refer to people who believe, but it also speaks of individuals being faithful in the sense of being trustworthy, loyal or dependable. I would like to suggest that these two senses, distinct though they may be are not as separate as they seem. Jesus was faithful (dependable, loyal etc) because of what he believed (pisteueo, the verbal form of pistis) about his father. Likewise the things that we truly believe are the things that we live out in our daily lives whether we like it or not.

Integrated Faith

If we are to live lives that are pleasing to God then, we need an integrated faith that encompasses both sides of the Heb 11:6 coin, as it were. James speaks of a type of faith that is disintegrated; where belief is divorced from action. The demons believe in God, but do not please him. In order to please God one must believe first that God exists, but also secondly that God is the type of person who rewards the pursuit of himself. The implication is clear. It is possible to believe in God but not be pleasing to him because we do not seek him. This is the type of faith that James says the demons have, dead disintegrated impotent passive, in a word faithless (as opposed to faithful) belief. If one does not actively, diligently, earnestly seek God, then it is clear that one does not really believe God. One has no faith.

Faith and Reward

To truly believe (in this holistic sense) that there is a God (one side of the ‘coin’ if you will) changes everything! Nothing is necessarily what it seems to the human senses and perceptions. If there is a God, then there is also an unseen Spiritual world, more real than the physical one and more important, to which the physical world itself may be said only to roughly and incompletely correspond. If there is a God, there is an eternity and we may live for things beyond this present life. Stuff does not have to make sense in this life. If there is a God, then there is a judgment, and sin matters. If there is a God, people created in his image matter. Compassion matters. Mercy has meaning. If there is one who rewards (the other side of the coin), and rewards what is done in secret (which we learn from the sermon on the mount), then what is done in secret matters—and matters more in fact that what is done in the open. God sees what is done in secret and rewards accordingly. If God is a rewarder of those who earnestly and diligently seek him, then it is surely worthwhile to earnestly and diligently seek him. And yet we cannot be said to truly believe this unless we act accordingly—that is unless we actually do earnestly and diligently seek him. Because if we truly have faith in that proposition; if we truly believe it, this faith will be evidenced in our faithfulness to it, this belief evidenced in our daily life.

The Rewarder and the Reward

I say all this for two reasons. The first is to make the point that faith matters. What we believe about God matters. That is to say, theology matters. The second is this. Faithfulness matters. My point here is not to search for yet another excuse to condemn ourselves for not having the type of devotional life that we feel we ought to—most Christians think that they ought to pray more, or study the bible more; in short lead a more consistent Christian life—rather I hope to fundamentally reorient this feeling of ought. The point is not that I ought to pray more, but rather that the God that exists is a God that can be known, and hence that prayer is real. Here is the compelling truth about the God we serve. He wants to be sought. He yearns to be found. He desires to reveal himself. This is surely the reward for those who seek—nothing less than intimate access to God’s own heart.


6 Comments

Theology and Experience

My Experience

Several years ago, when I made the decision to leave a job in pastoral ministry to do further training in theology I came up against a common obstacle—particularly common, I might say, in the Pentecostal-Charismatic/non-denom world that I inhabit. Several people questioned (quite sincerely) the wisdom of doing a formal program of study at all. And there was good reason for it. Had we not all witnessed many young people who had once been so zealous for God that they had taken that fateful decision to go to Bible college? And had we not also witnessed these same zealous ones becoming jaded and cynical, losing their ‘edge’, and sometimes losing their faith? Why would anyone want to study theology? The sentiment was most succinctly, and perhaps best put by a good friend who simply said, “The world doesn’t need more theologians, Clayton.” In a sense of course, he was right. The world does not need more stuffy scholars who care little for God or people, and who know how to articulate a faith with great precision that they have long since ceased to experience if they ever did. (My own experience in Christian higher education leads me to believe that very few such people exist and that this is an unfair caracaturisation by which sincere and good people permit themselves to stunt their own spiritual growth…but that is another story for another day).

The (Imagined) Gulf Between Theology and Experience

The fact is that a gulf exists—or at any rate is held to exist—between theology and experience. Those who have wonderful experiences of God often fear that the pursuit of theological learning will somehow nullify these (though they are often curiously blind to the role that theology itself has had in creating and fostering these experiences), or perhaps, deep down, that they will find that some of their experiences are either false or feigned. On the other hand, those who pride (I use that word advisedly) themselves on having good theology can often be dubious about the subjective nature of ‘experiences’ of God, perhaps fearing deep down that if tangibly experienced, God may ‘mess with their categories’ or they may lose control.

C.S. Lewis (in Mere Christianity Book 4, Chapter 1) tells the story of a talk he gave to airforce servicemen. After he had finished, an old officer approached him and began to protest that he did not need theology, for he had the real thing—an experience of God. Lewis’ reflections on this experience provides some valuable clarity on this issue. As such, I will quote him here at length beginning with the words of the ‘hard-bitten’ officer:

‘I’ve no use for all that stuff. But, mind you, I’m a religious man too. I know there’s a God. I’ve felt Him: out alone in the desert at night: the tremendous mystery. And that’s just why I don’t believe all your neat little dogmas and formulas about Him. To anyone who’s met the real thing they all seem so petty and pedantic and unreal!’

Now in a sense I quite agreed with that man. I think he had probably had a real experience of God in the desert. And when he turned from that experience to the Christian creeds, I think he really was turning from something real to something less real. In the same way, if a man has once looked at the Atlantic from the beach, and then goes and looks at a map of the Atlantic, he also will be turning from something real to something less real: turning from real waves to a bit of coloured paper. But here comes the point. The map is admittedly only coloured paper, but there are two things that you have to remember about it. In the first place, it is based on what hundreds and thousands of people have found out by sailing the real Atlantic. In that way it has behind it masses of experience just as real as the one you could have from the beach; only, while yours would be a single glimpse the map fits all those different experiences together. In the second place, if you want to go anywhere, the map is absolutely necessary. As long as you are content with walks on the beach, your own glimpses are far more fun than looking at a map. But the map is going to be more use than walks on the beach if you want to get to America….

In other words, Theology is practical: especially now. In the old days when there was less education and discussion, perhaps it was possible to get on with a very few simple ideas about God. But it is not so now. Everyone reads, everyone hears things discussed. Consequently, if you do not listen to Theology, that will not mean that you have no ideas about God. It will mean that you have a lot of wrong ones—bad, muddled, out-of-date ideas. For a great many of the ideas about God which are trotted out as novelties today are simply the ones which real Theologians tried centuries ago and rejected. To believe in the popular religion of modern England [or, we may now say, of the modern USA or modern Australia] is retrogression—like believing the earth is flat.

The Community of Living Faith: The Integration of Theology and Experience in the Church

An intellectual faith that has no basis in lived experience is really no faith at all. On the other hand the enthusiasm of a person who starts out with a vibrant experiential faith will inevitably wane unless they, in the words of 2 Pet 1:5 “make every effort to add to [their] faith virtue [that is, the lived experience of that faith]; and to virtue, knowledge…”.

And so, when it comes to theology and experience you cannot have one without the other. But I will go one step further than that. We will typically find that we have a natural bent to emphasise one over the other. The one who defaults to a more rational and analytical faith will find that God challenges them—yes, I said GOD, though he might use those raving fanatics that they have always feared becoming—to grow in the area of their experience of the faith. Conversely, the one who defaults to a more affective faith should not be surprised to find God—not the devil—challenge them to grow in the area of their knowledge.

Not only do we need both theology and experience to be healthy and balanced individual Christians then, but, more importantly in the Church, we need each other. And my highest priority in this regard should not be to do everything possible to ensure that those unlike me learn from me—the comfortable and easy thing—but rather to humbly, submittedly, and intentionally allow myself to be shaped by those who are not like me, but whom nevertheless, God has called me to walk with. This is neither easy, nor comfortable. But it is vital.

Now one final point. The watching world, to whom we as Christians bear witness, like the church, consists of all types. Some come with the questions of the mind, others with the questions of the heart, but deep down, all alike give expression to the hunger of the soul that can only be satisfied by the God who put it there. Whether we are testifying with tears, grappling with the Scriptures, praying for a miracle, or engaging the skeptic, we are bearing faithful witness to the Only One who can truly satisfy the soul: The God who is, the God who can be known, the God who yearns to be experienced, and the God whose mysteries are beyond all searching out.

So do we need more theologians? Or more evangelists? Do we need more knowledge or more experience? The answer of course, is yes.